Bug#843111: llvm-toolchain-3.7: FTBFS on i386

2016-11-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, > Moving GHC 8 to LLVM 3.8 would be possible with some minor patches from > upstream, though the lack of LLVM 3.8 on armel would be a big problem. Also > I'm > not sure the GHC maintainers want to deviate from upstream on the LLVM > version. > But we can move to 3.7 and drop 3.5 for now, then

Bug#843111: llvm-toolchain-3.7: FTBFS on i386

2016-11-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Sylvestre, On 04/11/16 09:46, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le 04/11/2016 à 00:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >> Source: llvm-toolchain-3.7 >> Version: 1:3.7.1-3 >> Severity: serious >> >> Hi, >> >> Your package failed to build on i386. We need llvm 3.7 in testing/stretch >> for ghc 8 (then we

Bug#843111: llvm-toolchain-3.7: FTBFS on i386

2016-11-04 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 04/11/2016 à 00:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : Source: llvm-toolchain-3.7 Version: 1:3.7.1-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package failed to build on i386. We need llvm 3.7 in testing/stretch for ghc 8 (then we can remove llvm 3.5), thus opening this bug. I wish I can remove 3.7 from the

Bug#843111: llvm-toolchain-3.7: FTBFS on i386

2016-11-03 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: llvm-toolchain-3.7 Version: 1:3.7.1-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package failed to build on i386. We need llvm 3.7 in testing/stretch for ghc 8 (then we can remove llvm 3.5), thus opening this bug. Cheers, Emilio -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable