On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:05:25 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> I now have uploaded the version (see previously sent debdiff) to
> security master and will release the regression update once all archs
> have build the packages.
Hello,
I have just tested the new revision (9.06~dfsg-2+deb8
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:05:25PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> I now have uploaded the version (see previously sent debdiff) to
> security master and will release the regression update once all archs
> have build the packages.
>
Hi,
I have now also uploaded the wheezy packages us
Hi
I now have uploaded the version (see previously sent debdiff) to
security master and will release the regression update once all archs
have build the packages.
Regards,
Salvatore
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:43:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > > I
Hi Francesco,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:43:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the prev
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:43:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the previous
> > > DSA?
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the previous
> > DSA? I assume that is what you plan to do, but I wanted to confirm to
> > be ce
Hi Roberto,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the previous
> DSA? I assume that is what you plan to do, but I wanted to confirm to
> be certain.
Yes exactly, that's the plan. I would still like to hear
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 01:12:10PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Packages with that patch added are now as well on
>
> https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/ghostscript/
>
> Please test those if possible for you.
>
Salvatore,
Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:31:15PM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > If it works, I will apply the same patch to the wheezy package and upload
> > it.
> I didn’t look at the jessie package but it is wheezy with debian-security
> where I figured out that changing that ,,put’’ to ,,.forceput’’ made evinc
> If it works, I will apply the same patch to the wheezy package and upload it.
I didn’t look at the jessie package but it is wheezy with debian-security where
I figured out that changing that ,,put’’ to ,,.forceput’’ made evince display
PostScript again.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Edgar Fuss has now posted where the bug actually seem to be. I'm
> currently building ghostscript with that.
>
Excellent. If it works, I will apply the same patch to the wheezy
package and upload it. Let me know if you ne
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:40:12AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:40:12AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > >
>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvatore mentioned that the same bug occurs when unstable has the
> > > se
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > Salvatore mentioned that the same bug occurs when unstable has the security
> > patches merged (which hasn't happened so far :-/), so this needs to be
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> Salvatore mentioned that the same bug occurs when unstable has the security
> patches merged (which hasn't happened so far :-/), so this needs to be
> reported
> upstream.
>
Would that be to ghostscript upstream? I guess t
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:09:54PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Hi Roberto
> > >
> > > Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
>
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:09:54PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Roberto
> >
> > Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
> > https://bugs.debian.org/840691 in wheezy? Note although the bug is
> > still ass
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Roberto
>
> Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
> https://bugs.debian.org/840691 in wheezy? Note although the bug is
> still assigned to ghostscript I think the problem uncovered is
> actually in libspectre a
On 25/10/16 21:54, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Roberto
>
> Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
> https://bugs.debian.org/840691 in wheezy? Note although the bug is
> still assigned to ghostscript I think the problem uncovered is
> actually in libspectre as noted in the bug log.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Roberto
>
> Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
> https://bugs.debian.org/840691 in wheezy? Note although the bug is
> still assigned to ghostscript I think the problem uncovered is
> actually in libspectre a
Hi Roberto
Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
https://bugs.debian.org/840691 in wheezy? Note although the bug is
still assigned to ghostscript I think the problem uncovered is
actually in libspectre as noted in the bug log. But I wonder if you
see the same issues in wheezy now that
23 matches
Mail list logo
