On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:39:54PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Andreas Tille]
> > I just want to hear confirmation from some Debian Edu developer
> > whether the upload of blends-dev 0.6.95 is OK.
>
> As far as I can tell, these changes are intended and reflect changes
> done to the sourc
[Andreas Tille]
> I just want to hear confirmation from some Debian Edu developer
> whether the upload of blends-dev 0.6.95 is OK.
As far as I can tell, these changes are intended and reflect changes
done to the source code. But I have not tracked the Debian Edu
development closely for a while.
Hi Ole,
sorry for my longer than planned silence but today I found the time
to repeat all tests with your new version.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:12:00AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi Andreas, Petter and all,
>
>
> On 15.11.2016 07:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> Use of uninitialized value $_
[Ole]
> Great! Could I in return ask you for the favour looking into the
> patched blend-gen-control to see why the lines with a backslash are
> not eaten up, so that one has to remove them later again?
>
> (see one of my previous mails)
I will try to find time have a look. Could you prepare and
Hi Andreas, Petter and all,
On 15.11.2016 07:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just want to announce that I'll be de-facto offline today and
> tomorrow. So I can not do further testing of the "Use of uninitialized
> value" testing.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016
Hi,
I just want to announce that I'll be de-facto offline today and
tomorrow. So I can not do further testing of the "Use of uninitialized
value" testing.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:50:12AM +0
Hi Petter,
On 11.11.2016 11:50, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ole Streicher]
>> OK, I committed another version, with backslashes everywhere. Adjusted
>> tool is attached.
> Very good. This one look like it should still work, and fixes a few
> mistakes in the process. Thank you very much.
>
>>
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:50:12AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ole Streicher]
> > OK, I committed another version, with backslashes everywhere. Adjusted
> > tool is attached.
>
> Very good. This one look like it should still work, and fixes a few
> mistakes in the process. Thank yo
[Ole Streicher]
> OK, I committed another version, with backslashes everywhere. Adjusted
> tool is attached.
Very good. This one look like it should still work, and fixes a few
mistakes in the process. Thank you very much.
> I tried as much as possible. However, trailing spaces are still
> remo
Hi Petter,
On 11.11.2016 11:03, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ole Streicher]
>> I updated all tasks of debian-edu to be RFC834 compliant: continuation
>> with indentation, no backslashes, no duplicated keywords. The diff looks
>> OK for me; you should however double check.
>>
>> If you don't like
[Ole Streicher]
> I updated all tasks of debian-edu to be RFC834 compliant: continuation
> with indentation, no backslashes, no duplicated keywords. The diff looks
> OK for me; you should however double check.
>
> If you don't like it, revert and discuss it.
This is not going to fly. The Debian E
Hi Andreas, Petter, and all
I updated all tasks of debian-edu to be RFC834 compliant: continuation
with indentation, no backslashes, no duplicated keywords. The diff looks
OK for me; you should however double check.
If you don't like it, revert and discuss it.
I wrote a small Python script for t
Hi all,
On 11.11.2016 08:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:38:32PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> --> debian-edu tasks are just broken. They don't follow any rule, and
>> depending from the parser one will get always different results. Maybe
>> we should fix that? remove all ba
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:38:32PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> On 10.11.2016 21:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > So I confirm that the first problem we detected is solved but there is
> > another one breaking Debian Edu. I have again no suspicion why the '\'
> > sign is not elimiunated from the
Hi Andreas, Petter and all,
On 10.11.2016 21:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So I confirm that the first problem we detected is solved but there is
> another one breaking Debian Edu. I have again no suspicion why the '\'
> sign is not elimiunated from the list only in those few cases.
I can also just
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 01:53:20PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >
> > gbp clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/med.git
> > cd med
> > make dist
> > grep ^, debian/control
Debian Med and Debian Science are OK with the patch, however:
gbp clone ssh://git.debian.or
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 01:53:20PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> This is what I meant, and it is fixed by my last commit. Please try
> again ;-)
Quick note from bad connection. Seems to work now. I'll try later more
carefully.
Thanks for your contribution
Andreas.
--
http://fam-till
Hi Andreas,
On 10.11.2016 13:48, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Petter,
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:39:07PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + pending
>>
>> [Andreas Tille]
Should I commit it?
>>> Yes please. Ole, you reported problems with your patch. Could you
>>> pleas
Hi Petter,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:39:07PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> [Andreas Tille]
> >> Should I commit it?
> >
> > Yes please. Ole, you reported problems with your patch. Could you
> > please be more verbose about this problem - at best based on Pe
Control: tags -1 + pending
[Andreas Tille]
>> Should I commit it?
>
> Yes please. Ole, you reported problems with your patch. Could you
> please be more verbose about this problem - at best based on Petter's
> commit to make sure we are all working on the same code?
It is now commited. Please
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #840094 [blends-dev] blends-dev: Does not recognize multiline dependencies
Added tag(s) pending.
--
840094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840094
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Petter,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:07:47AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> I have not followed this issue closely, but started reading on Andreas
> request.
Thanks a lot for your quick response.
> First of all, I believe this issue is based on incorrect documentation.
Yes.
> The tas
I have not followed this issue closely, but started reading on Andreas
request.
First of all, I believe this issue is based on incorrect documentation.
The task files have never been RFC822 compliant. I agree that they
should be RFC822 compliant, but the only handled continuation method
implemen
Hi Ole,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:56:50AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> If one of our main tools is not compliant with our documented
> specifications, and this may cause incomplete metapackages (which are
> one central part of the blend), then I would still rate this as an RC
> bug, independe
Hi Ole,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:06:52AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >
> >> it's indeed to late in the stretch dev cycle in my opinion.
> >
> > That would mean to lower the severity of #840094. Ole, are you OK with
> > this?
>
> No, I am not. The tool gives wrong results, and it does so si
Hi Andreas and Bas,
On 10.11.2016 08:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:27:13PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 11/09/2016 03:35 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> If you (and Bas and other readers here) think we should fix the issue
>>> right now I'm fine if you apply the p
Hi Andreas and Bas,
On 10.11.2016 08:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:27:13PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 11/09/2016 03:35 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> If you (and Bas and other readers here) think we should fix the issue
>>> right now I'm fine if you apply the p
Hi Andreas & all,
On 09.11.2016 15:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> We have a clear definition of how these files should look like, namely
>> RFC822, and this also defines continuation lines.
>
> Unfortunately in this specific feature tasks files are not RFC822
> compliant, which sucks, yes. Its even
Hi Bas,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:27:13PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 03:35 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > If you (and Bas and other readers here) think we should fix the issue
> > right now I'm fine if you apply the patch below and we should seriously
> > test the metapacka
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> On 09.11.2016 12:47, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > In other words: Once it was defined as syntax for these control files
> > that newlines need to be escaped. I do not like it and as I said this
> > is fixed in the long-term pending rewri
Hi Andreas,
On 09.11.2016 12:47, Andreas Tille wrote:
> In other words: Once it was defined as syntax for these control files
> that newlines need to be escaped. I do not like it and as I said this
> is fixed in the long-term pending rewrite. However, the bug is not
> serious but at best wishli
Hi Ole,
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:33:27AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/08/2016 11:15 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > When a "Depends:" field in a task file contains more than one line, only
> > the first line is used to create the dependency in debian/control. All
> > others are silen
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:33:27AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/08/2016 11:15 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > When a "Depends:" field in a task file contains more than one line, only
> > the first line is used to create the dependency in debian/control. All
> > others are silently ignor
On 10/08/2016 11:15 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> When a "Depends:" field in a task file contains more than one line, only
> the first line is used to create the dependency in debian/control. All
> others are silently ignored.
You can have dependencies on multiple lines when you escape the newline.
S
Package: blends-dev
Version: 0.6.94
Severity: serious
When a "Depends:" field in a task file contains more than one line, only
the first line is used to create the dependency in debian/control. All
others are silently ignored.
I observed this on the "debian-astro" package which uses blends-dev.
35 matches
Mail list logo
