Control: tags -1 patch
Ahh, (partly) my fault: I checked only the result, not the full log.
I've committed a patch to the git repo. Daniel, will you upload or shall I?
Best
Ole
> > i was able to reproduce it just now in a clean pbuilder chroot, build
> > log attached
> >
> > this is still an RC bug affecting stretch
>From what I can see here, these are test failures and not a FTBFS. Is this
actually an RC bug?
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
ser
On 08.02.2017 13:54, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> control: reopen -1
>
> not so fast..
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Hi Daniel, Sandro,
>>
>> I tried to reproduce the bug and could not get the failure with the
>> latest unstable (Python revision 3.5.3-1). So, I would recomm
control: reopen -1
not so fast..
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Sandro,
>
> I tried to reproduce the bug and could not get the failure with the
> latest unstable (Python revision 3.5.3-1). So, I would recommend to
> either close the bug as unreproducible, or at
On 08.02.2017 10:17, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Sandro,
>
> I tried to reproduce the bug and could not get the failure with the
> latest unstable (Python revision 3.5.3-1). So, I would recommend to
> either close the bug as unreproducible, or at least to downgrade the
> severity.
>
> IMO t
Hi Daniel, Sandro,
I tried to reproduce the bug and could not get the failure with the
latest unstable (Python revision 3.5.3-1). So, I would recommend to
either close the bug as unreproducible, or at least to downgrade the
severity.
IMO the package is worth to be kept in Stretch.
If you don't v
Hey Daniel,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 17:16:26 +0200 Daniel Stender wrote:
> Source: lasagne
> Version: 0.1+git20160728.8b66737-1
> Severity: normal
>
> On Python 3.5, there are two failures in the tests:
...
quite a long time has passed, and likely the git snapshot is outdated
now and it's not even
7 matches
Mail list logo
