forwarded 830500 https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/2789
tags 830500 + pending
thanks
Ah, this was filed upstream :)
https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/2789
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
> Hmm, I wonder if this might be a failure that only occurs randomly,
> based on timing or something like that.
Could you try the attached patch?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
diff --git a/tests/integration/re
> Hmm, I wonder if this might be a failure that only occurs randomly,
> based on timing or something like that.
This could be right - there seems to be some "sleep" and "delay" calls
in there. Will try building a few times..
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'`
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Interestingly, it fails on i386's 2nd build on the reproducible
> testing framework.. but only in testing (!).
Hmm, I wonder if this might be a failure that only occurs randomly,
based on timing or something like that.
--
Daniel Schepler
> Hm, still cannot reproduce. :) I would be tempted to think it's something
> about it starting a server (networking, ports, blah, etc.), but a lot
> of the tests do that - ie. the question why does only *this* one fail..
Interestingly, it fails on i386's 2nd build on the reproducible
testing fram
> > Interesting. Can't seem to reproduce here in latest sid. Do you
> > have limited memory or something like that..? Concurrency..?
>
> No, the machine has 8 GB of RAM. I also don't recall the machine
> being heavily loaded when I reran the test build to confirm. The
> first time, I used DEB_BU
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Interesting. Can't seem to reproduce here in latest sid. Do you have limited
> memory or something like that..? Concurrency..?
No, the machine has 8 GB of RAM. I also don't recall the machine
being heavily loaded when I reran the test build to
tags 830500 + unreproducible
thanks
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> [err]: Test replication partial resync: ok psync (diskless: yes,
> reconnect: 1) in tests/integration/replication-psync.tcl
> Expected condition '[s -1 sync_partial_ok] > 0' to be true ([s -1
> sync_partial_ok] > 0)
Interesting. Can't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 830500 + unreproducible
Bug #830500 [src:redis] redis: FTBFS: Test failure
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
830500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Source: redis
Version: 2:3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
>From my pbuilder build log (on amd64):
...
[38/41 done]: integration/replication-3 (37 seconds)
[ok]: Client output buffer hard limit is enforced
[ok]: Test replication partial resync: ok after delay (diskless: no,
reconnect: 1)
[ok]: Connect mu
10 matches
Mail list logo