On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:30:53 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 21:51:01 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Gregor, is there anything you want me to do? The difference is mostly
> > that I tried to keep the "ifdef openssl version" check in one spot and
> > got rid of RSA_
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 21:51:01 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > If we can't get an upstream reaction (which seems probable), maybe
> > Petr and Sebastian can at least cross-check their patches and come up
> > with a common one?
> Gregor, is there anything you want me to do? The difference
On 2016-11-26 16:18:44 [+0100], gregor herrmann wrote:
> I also mentioned your patch in the upstream bug:
> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=117481
> which contains a different patch from Petr Písař.
>
> No reaction there from either Petr or the upstream authors.
> I just pinged the tick
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 04:18:44PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> If we can't get an upstream reaction (which seems probable), maybe
> Petr and Sebastian can at least cross-check their patches and come up
> with a common one?
>
The Debian patch is more future proof as it assumes the old OpenSSL w
On Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:17:10 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-10-01 22:04:02 [+0200], To Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > compiles, test suite passes. There is still RSA_generate_key().
> since that code is *that* old here is a version without
> RSA_generate_key() so we don't have to touch
5 matches
Mail list logo
