On dinsdag 8 maart 2016 15:49:46 CET Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> I plan to move to a manual installation of ownCloud
> using upstream provided tarball ...
> Do you think such setup will be viable (especially with respect to the
> various dependencies) on a sid system?
Whatever you do, DO run it in
Hi,
Le 08/03/2016 10:49, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> Le lundi 07 mars 2016 à 22:32 -0400, David Prévot a écrit :
>> But please, be aware that the enormous owncloud
>> package is only the tip of the iceberg: beyond the ~70 packages (some
>> were already removed via #816769) listed on the [DDPO]
Le lundi 07 mars 2016 à 22:32 -0400, David Prévot a écrit :
> Le 07/03/2016 12:43, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> Reading the (recent) threads on both the maintainer and upstream lists
> should help anyone to make their mind about it (I’ll give a few
> pointers). Seeing how Debian is described in
On dinsdag 8 maart 2016 08:37:35 CET David Prévot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 08/03/2016 03:03, Jos Poortvliet a écrit :
> > The situation is rather sad and frustrating
>
> OK.
>
> > as users who decided to trust the Debian developers and took their
> > packages over ownCloud's provided packages are now
Hi,
Le 08/03/2016 03:03, Jos Poortvliet a écrit :
> The situation is rather sad and frustrating
OK.
> as users who decided to trust the Debian developers and took their packages
> over ownCloud's provided packages are now stuck on a version which can't
> trivially be upgraded to either our up
On Monday, March 7, 2016 5:43:20 PM AMT Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> First, let me thank you for the work that you put into packaging
> owncloud for Debian, it is really appreciated.
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:07:10 -0400 David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pr=E9vot?=
> wrote:
>
> > Upstream do
Hi Sébastien,
Le 07/03/2016 12:43, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:07:10 -0400 David Prévot wrote:
>
>> Upstream doesn’t wish to see their software in Debian anymore. Unless
>> the situation changes in the next few months, owncloud will not be part
>> of Stretch.
[…]
> I a
Dear David,
First, let me thank you for the work that you put into packaging
owncloud for Debian, it is really appreciated.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:07:10 -0400 David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pr=E9vot?=
wrote:
> Upstream doesn’t wish to see their software in Debian anymore. Unless
> the situation changes i
On Dienstag, 1. März 2016 07:07:10 CET David Prévot wrote:
> Package: owncloud
> Version: 7.0.12~dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream
>
> Upstream doesn’t wish to see their software in Debian anymore. Unless
> the situation changes in the next few months, owncloud will not be part
> of Stre
On Tuesday 01 March 2016 07:07:10 you wrote:
> Upstream doesn’t wish to see their software in Debian anymore. Unless
> the situation changes in the next few months, owncloud will not be part
> of Stretch.
As unfortunate as it is, I can't help but agree.
It can be a coincidence [1], but earlier to
Package: owncloud
Version: 7.0.12~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Upstream doesn’t wish to see their software in Debian anymore. Unless
the situation changes in the next few months, owncloud will not be part
of Stretch.
Quoting the Debian Developer's Reference [3.1.4]:
“If you find that
11 matches
Mail list logo
