On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 at 18:51:35 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> python-whoosh is not important at all for Sphinx, it is just one of the search
> backends for Sphinx websupport extension.
OK. If the FTBFSs and the ensuing ftp-master issues (python-whoosh is
claimed to be NEW now because the documen
Hi all,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 08:21:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [...]
>
> sphinx maintainers, celery-haystack maintainers: your packages build-depend
> on python-whoosh. How important is it for those packages? Do you want to
> adopt it?
python-whoosh is not important at all for Sphinx,
On Jan 30, 2017, at 08:21 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>Thanks for letting me know, I'll mark it as unmaintained. Would you like
>your other packages to be marked as unmaintained too?
>
>Sorry, I am not intending to adopt python-whoosh: I'm only fixing it
>because removing it from testing would be di
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 04:20:12 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Thanks for uploading. Please feel free to takeover the maintainership of
> python-whoosh as I am MIA since 1.5 year.
Thanks for letting me know, I'll mark it as unmaintained. Would you like
your other packages to be marked as unmaintain
Thanks for uploading. Please feel free to takeover the maintainership of
python-whoosh as I am MIA since 1.5 year.
On January 22, 2017 9:06:35 PM GMT+02:00, Simon McVittie
wrote:
>Control: tags 812768 + patch
>Control: tags 812768 + pending
>
>Dear maintainer,
>
>I've prepared an NMU for python
Control: tags 812768 + patch
Control: tags 812768 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for python-whoosh (versioned as 2.7.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I've also pushed the changes to collab-maint git: please revert any
6 matches
Mail list logo
