On 02/09/2016 08:14 PM, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> Unfortunately unsatisfyable recommends are a policy violation though,
> and even while I understand the sentiments of not wanting to have to
> reupload wine to add it, I don't see a way around this.
[...]
>> Rhonda, do you see any flexibility in inter
On 02/09/2016 08:10 PM, Austin English wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2016 11:08 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>> * Austin English [2016-02-09 17:45:02 CET]:
>>> On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:06:29 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> * updating the licensing information for each new wine-gecko release is
> extraordinarily time-consuming, on the order of 150-200h per release (and
> even then I miss issues) – TBH I've stalled on this, I'm thinking of
Just to be clear,
Hi Jens,
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:49:43 +0100, Jens Reyer wrote:
> Stephen, can you shed some light on the main problem(s) blocking
> frequent Gecko releases? Let's say, there's some chance that I help.
There are two issues:
* wine-gecko typically requires a git snapshot of mingw-w64, so supporting
Hey,
* Jens Reyer [2016-02-09 19:49:43 CET]:
> In Wine we depend on libwine-gecko-xxx before it's added to the archive,
> knowing/hoping/assuming that it will be added to the archive, which has
> always been true for Debian stable releases, but not for all
> intermittent Gecko versions that we
On Feb 9, 2016 11:08 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
> * Austin English [2016-02-09 17:45:02 CET]:
> > On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:
Hi,
* Austin English [2016-02-09 17:45:02 CET]:
> On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > > > > > From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is
Hi
In Wine we depend on libwine-gecko-xxx before it's added to the archive,
knowing/hoping/assuming that it will be added to the archive, which has
always been true for Debian stable releases, but not for all
intermittent Gecko versions that were needed in between (maintainer is
in both cases the
On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> >
> > * Austin English [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]:
> > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > > severity 812750 serious
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> >
On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>
> * Austin English [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]:
> > On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > severity 812750 serious
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > > > From all I can tell, the
On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>
> severity 812750 serious
> thanks
>
> Hi!
>
> * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > >From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There
is no wine-gecko packaged in Debian
> > (the recommendation of libwine-gecko-2.40
* Austin English [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]:
> On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > severity 812750 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > > From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There
> > > is no wine-gecko p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 812750 serious
Bug #812750 [wine] wine: Gecko integration is broken
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
812750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
13 matches
Mail list logo
