On 2016-10-03 10:31:42 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> it has to be fixed *both* in unstable and experimental if we want to
> eventually be able to remove boost1.58,
OK, I didn't know that experimental was affected too. I thought
that upstream would have added C++11 support in the latest version.
N
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 10:31:41AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Anyway, I believed I uploaded both versions, experimental and unstable,
> let me check where the latter went...
well, apparently I just forgot to upload, given that locally I also
lacked the ceph_0.80.11-1.1_source.ftp-master.upload
control: fixed -1 0.94.5-1.1
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:26:54PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On 2016-10-01 10:34:58 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Source: ceph
> > Source-Version: 0.94.5-1.1
>
> I'm reopening the bug since the unstable/testing version is still
> affec
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 0.94.5-1.1
Bug #811674 [ceph] FTBFS with GCC 6: multiple errors
Marked as fixed in versions ceph/0.94.5-1.1.
--
811674: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811674
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: reopen -1
On 2016-10-01 10:34:58 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Source: ceph
> Source-Version: 0.94.5-1.1
I'm reopening the bug since the unstable/testing version is still
affected. The fix should have been applied to the unstable version
(0.80.11-1), not to the experimental version. The
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #811674 {Done: Mattia Rizzolo } [ceph] FTBFS with GCC 6:
multiple errors
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixe
6 matches
Mail list logo
