On 01/31/2017 09:55 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Which tarball are you using, and do you have the build dependency
> libopencryptoki-dev installed?
Yay conditional compilation. I didn't forward port the packaging yet.
> I am using the one from
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/trousers/files/tpm-
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:24:34PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/31/2017 07:46 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> so tpm-utils 1.3.9 fixes OpenSSL 1.1 compatibility
> > does 1.3.9 compile for you with OpenSSL 1.1?
>
> 1.3.9 s
Hi,
On 01/31/2017 07:46 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> so tpm-utils 1.3.9 fixes OpenSSL 1.1 compatibility
> does 1.3.9 compile for you with OpenSSL 1.1?
1.3.9 still has two issues with -Werror, but none with OpenSSL 1.1 AFAICS.
Specifica
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Philipp,
> so tpm-utils 1.3.9 fixes OpenSSL 1.1 compatibility
>...
does 1.3.9 compile for you with OpenSSL 1.1?
If it would have compiled for me, I would have NMU'd it a few weeks ago.
> Kind regards
> Philipp Kern
cu
Adri
Hi,
so tpm-utils 1.3.9 fixes OpenSSL 1.1 compatibility and does include the
compile fix for GCC 6 as well. The diffstat of just *.c and *.h,
ignoring the autotools noise (which is massive) is just this:
include/tpm_utils.h |8 ++
lib/tpm_pkcs11.c| 12 ++--
lib/tpm_tspi
5 matches
Mail list logo