Bug#810885: libelf-dev requires libc >= 2.22

2016-01-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 16:58 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > But maybe I can fix the installed headers to not require a newer > glibc version ... I just posted an upstream fix to do this: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/elfutils-devel% 40lists.fedorahosted.org/message/2FU5HOHMLA47PPD44NQQP

Bug#810885: libelf-dev requires libc >= 2.22

2016-01-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:36:51AM +0100, Andreas Boll wrote: > Using libc 2.22 from experimental fixes this issue. > > It seems that this implicit dependency on libc 2.22 was > introduced in this > upstream change [1]. > > jcristau found the corresponding libc patch [2]. > > Please consider revert

Bug#810885: libelf-dev requires libc >= 2.22

2016-01-13 Thread Andreas Boll
Package: libelf-dev Version: 0.165-1 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, the newest upload of libelf-dev doesn't work with libc 2.21-6 and thus breaks the build of mesa. I've reproduced the FTBFS with the following minimal testcase: cat > elf-ftbfs.c << EOF #include EOF gcc -c elf-ftbfs.c In f