On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:21:03 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:01:08PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> [...]
> > But it should work.
> >
> > An "exit 0" at the end, or a "if [ -d ... ]; then rmdir .. ; fi" would
> > also work instead and might be preferable.
On Fri, 06 Nov 2015, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:01:08PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> [...]
> > But it should work.
> >
> > An "exit 0" at the end, or a "if [ -d ... ]; then rmdir .. ; fi" would
> > also work instead and might be preferable.
>
> Pleas
Hi again.
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:01:08PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
[...]
> But it should work.
>
> An "exit 0" at the end, or a "if [ -d ... ]; then rmdir .. ; fi" would
> also work instead and might be preferable.
Please stop suggesting exit 0. It does not work. Hopefully the attached
m
On Fri, 06 Nov 2015, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > libuuid1 fails to upgrade cleanly in sid under certain circumstances:
> [...]
>
> While the upgrade code is no longer needed (given that the migration
> should already have happened during Wheezy->Jessie upgrade) it
> might be useful to keep it a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #804167 [libuuid1] fails to upgrade
Added tag(s) pending.
--
804167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804167
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hello Peter Palfrader.
Thanks for your bug report.
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 05:27:38PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Package: libuuid1
> Version: 2.27.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> libuuid1 fails to upgrade cleanly in sid under certain circumstances:
[...]
Wh
Package: libuuid1
Version: 2.27.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
libuuid1 fails to upgrade cleanly in sid under certain circumstances:
| (sid-amd64-sbuild)root@burlewii:~# apt-cache policy libuuid1
| libuuid1:
| Installed: 2.27-3
| Candidate: 2.27-3
| Version table:
| *** 2.27-3 0
| 100
7 matches
Mail list logo
