Quoting Sebastian Ramacher :
I've closed the bug due to the recent d-d-annouce mail asking to not
file bugs
for these kind of linker failures. Instead it should be checked whether
transition bugs for the libraries exists and file bugs against them.
Seems that I missed this, thanks for poin
On 2015-08-06 12:08:44, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Source: libffado
> Followup-For: Bug #794701
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Well, techhnically this bug is still unsresolved, so I wondering why you are
> closing it.
> More accurate would be to reassign it then to libxml++ and glibmm2.4 (I will
> do so afte
Source: libffado
Followup-For: Bug #794701
Hi Sebastian,
Well, techhnically this bug is still unsresolved, so I wondering why you are
closing it.
More accurate would be to reassign it then to libxml++ and glibmm2.4 (I will do
so afterwards)
However, can you advice the transistion bug for libxm
Package: libffado
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-5
Dear Maintainer,
When rebuilding your package against the new libconfig, I figured out that it
fails to build due to the GCC5 transition.
Build-log attached.
--
tobi
-- System Infor
4 matches
Mail list logo
