Hi
On 10-08-15 11:45, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Does this give enough info to lower the severity of the bug or to
> forward the bug to binutils?
I don't know. When I just tried to reproduce Abou's results of
yesterday, the ld call doesn't seem to be the problem to me. When I let
the process run a
Hi All
According to [1] mentioned by Jonas in [2], the bug is in ld from bin utils and
is fixed upstream.
Does this give enough info to lower the severity of the bug or to forward the
bug to binutils?
[1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18344
[2] http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?
Hi
On 09-08-15 21:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> So maybe we need just to rebuild again?
>
> Looking at what Graham already did, it does not appear to help.
But maybe it does... the linker was updated yesterday, so maybe that is
why your problem didn't appear after stripping.
If that is true, we jus
Hi Abou,
On 09-08-15 20:39, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>> I'll file a bug upstream.
Graham was able to get a little further as well, which is documented in
the upstream bug report [1].
> I tried this on porterbox abel and reproduced the issue. However I failed to
> completely understand it.
>
> It
Hi All,
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 12:07 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I tried a simpler package, ddrescueview [1], and instead of building the
> Debian package, I simply ran:
>
> lazbuild source/ddrescueview.lpi --bm="GNU/Linux Release"
>
> As before, the build appeared to stall, and after hitting c
5 matches
Mail list logo
