Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2015, 09:58 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> unfortunately, I had no luck convincing the SRM to accept my proposed e
> -d-s update in Jessie in #789429. I didn't even receive a singly reply
> after ~2 months. Maybe one of you wants to try his luck with it?
So, 8.2 has been
Hi there,
Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:46 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> I put 3.12.11 in unstable precisely so that it gets a little testing,
> and I’d indeed like to see it in 8.2 if the diff is acceptable.
unfortunately, I had no luck convincing the SRM to accept my proposed e
-d-s update
On 15/06/15 12:28, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> OK. But beware of http://bugs.debian.org/787624 when trying to push
>> this to jessie.
>
> So, there are two package revisions +deb8u{1,2} that are currently
> missing from the "
Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> OK. But beware of http://bugs.debian.org/787624 when trying to push
> this to jessie.
So, there are two package revisions +deb8u{1,2} that are currently
missing from the "jessie" branch in SVN, right?
What is the "gbp impor
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to
get
> 3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for upstream
> point updates?
You can try. It may depend on how big the debdiff is and on wh
On 15/06/15 10:46, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to
> get
> > 3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for
> upstream
> > point updates?
>
> Yo
On 15/06/15 07:53, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>>
>> There's already a branch in pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data
>> -server/. Use
>> that, build and test the packages in jessie, then open a p-u bug
>> against
Hi Emilio,
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>
> There's already a branch in pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data
> -server/. Use
> that, build and test the packages in jessie, then open a p-u bug
> against
> release.debian.org with a debdiff from jessie atta
Hi Fabian,
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:18:59 +0200 Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Dear pkg-evolution,
>
> this bug is present in the versions of e-d-s/libcamel currently in
> unstable/testing and stable. It is really severe as it prevents mails
> from being sent without evolution (and thus the user) takin
Dear pkg-evolution,
this bug is present in the versions of e-d-s/libcamel currently in
unstable/testing and stable. It is really severe as it prevents mails
from being sent without evolution (and thus the user) taking any notice
of it. It thus may cause (and already has for me) silent data loss.
Package: evolution-data-server
Version: 3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2+deb8u2
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: causes serious data loss
Hi there,
there is a serious bug in libcamel 3.12.3. This bug is not fixed in
3.12.11 and since 3.12.11 is the last upstream release of that
branch, it
11 matches
Mail list logo
