Thanks for looking over the patch.
> PS Stuart, your patch has Subject: "PATCH 1/2" -- was there a second
>patch in the series, or did you just extract it from a larger
>patchset you were playing with?
The second patch is changing the related tests to use @unittest.skip*
decorators rath
Control: affects 782904 gpgv
over on https://bugs.debian.org/782904,
On Sun 2015-04-19 12:31:22 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> When running tests with gnupg-2.1.3 installed, I get several failures.
Stuart Prescott wrote:
> So gpgv now includes PROGRESS, NEWSIG and KEY_CONSIDERED output. None of
Processing control commands:
> affects 782904 gpgv
Bug #782904 [python-debian] python-debian test failures with gnupg-2.1.3
Added indication that 782904 affects gpgv
--
782904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Control: tags -1 + patch
> The test suite failures reported in this bug still exist with gpgv 2.1.14-3
> from experimental.
The root of the problem is that the new gpgv spits out a lot more information
on status-fd than it used to and the test suite is strict in not wanting to
see extra fields
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #782904 [python-debian] python-debian test failures with gnupg-2.1.3
Added tag(s) patch.
--
782904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #782904 [python-debian] python-debian test failures with gnupg-2.1.3
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
782904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
6 matches
Mail list logo
