Hi Gaudenz, Paul and others,
Yes, Gaudenz, there is an issue which is still embargoed. I'm getting
confused as to what I am allowed to discuss or not. Since this bug was
opened, I should be able to tell everything, as it's IMO too late to
believe the embargo worked, but anyway, I will still shut u
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:18:46PM +, Paul McMillan wrote:
> > If you agree that the linked github patch is complete, I can do an
> > upload if you lack the time to do so yourself. I can understand that
> > sensitive security issues are involved, but a bit more verboseness would
> > be nice.
>
> Do you have a link to the upstream discussion? Or is this about an
> embargoed security issue?
The other ticket is an embargoed security issue, unrelated to this
one, in an upstream package which is not novnc. Thomas was incorrect
to bring it up in this context.
> I'm confused. What's true now,
Thomas Goirand writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not supposed to disclose too much yet, but I have to write in this
> bug still.
>
> The provided patch is *not enough* and the issue is still being
> discussed upstream. So I can't just patch novnc and be gone with it...
> I'll update this package as soon as
4 matches
Mail list logo
