Hi Ned,
Formally yes, but see my response to #821237, whose action may moot the
point. I'll update this bug with whatever info that one brings shortly.
Best regards,
Evan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Evan,
I have not received a response from you regarding this bug since it was
submitted last year. Are you still maintaining abduco in Debian?
--
Ned T. Crigler
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:39:34PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> So there are indeed a small number of code locations which look
> suspiciously similar.
There are other similarities between the initial commit of abduco and
dtach, such as the code declaring abduco's client to server protocol:
[a
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi,
Ned T. Crigler wrote:
> abduco is derived from dtach,
According to the abduco upstream web page, it is only "in many ways
very similar", but not derived. I checked the initial import of abduco
(commit 89cbbb3aa6aea7ca7410096aeacc3316a3532344) against dtach 0.8.
I
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #771102 [abduco] upstream license violation
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
771102: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Package: abduco
Version: 0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Hi,
abduco is derived from dtach, which is licensed under GPLv2. However,
abduco is licensed under ISC with dtach's copyright notices removed.
While abduco may be considered a rewrite of dtach that just has similar
lookin
6 matches
Mail list logo
