Hi Guillem,
On Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, Guillem Jover wrote:
> That's because that upgrade is still using dpkg 1.17.21, which does
> not force the upgrade of readahead-fedora, and then it's still using
> the old readahead-fedora 2:1.5.6-4 w/o the fix. No bug here, besides
> using old package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 769557 readahead-fedora
Bug #769557 [readahea-fedora] education-common: package fails to upgrade
properly from wheezy
Warning: Unknown package 'readahea-fedora'
Bug reassigned from package 'readahea-fedora' to 'readahead-fedora'.
Ignorin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 768600
Bug #768600 {Done: Guillem Jover } [readahead-fedora]
readahead-fedora: cycle found while processing triggers
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may n
reopen 768600
found 768600 2:1.5.6-5.2
reassign 769557 readahea-fedora
forcemerge 768600 769557
affect 768600 education-desktop-lxde
affect 768600 education-desktop-sugar
affect 768600 education-common
affect 768600 education-desktop-xfce
thanks
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi Don,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> is it accepted by bendel (lists.debian.org)
>
> And then it gets discarded by the mailing list because the message was
> too large. I think the limit is 200K, and that message exceeds it.
ah, thanks. Did Lucas get a warning about this
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi owner@bugs + listmasters,
>
> any idea why #769557 (Message-ID: <20141114122853.ga11...@xanadu.blop.info>)
> wasn't send to debian-...@lists.debian.org?
Nov 14 12:46:12 s_local@bendel postfix/smtp[22501]: A9DE96F5:
to=, orig_to=,
relay=127.0.0.1[
Hi owner@bugs + listmasters,
any idea why #769557 (Message-ID: <20141114122853.ga11...@xanadu.blop.info>)
wasn't send to debian-...@lists.debian.org?
+thanks for all your work on keeping the infrastructure running so nicely
99,999% of the time! :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
I suspect this metapackage upgrade problem was triggered by bug #768600
fixed in readahead-fedora version 2:1.5.6-5.2. If I got it right, it
was a problem exposed/triggered by a new dpkg version changing how
triggers were handled, and not really something we can fix in
education-common.
--
Happ
8 matches
Mail list logo
