On 13/10/14 00:37, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Would a BSD-style netinet/tcp.h be a good candidate to ship in libbsd-dev?
...and also netinet/udp.h, due to udphdr.
More packages (unported yet) that could benefit from BSD struct
tcphdr/udphdr definitions are:
* ntop
* pchar
* scamper
* rtp
Hi Guillem,
Would a BSD-style netinet/tcp.h be a good candidate to ship in libbsd-dev?
> On 12/10/14 16:45, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> glibc-provided features.h no longer defines a __FAVOR_BSD macro, so the
>> BSD version of struct tcphdr in netinet/tcp.h cannot be used, [...]
glibc upstream h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 764692 -1
Bug #764692 [src:usbmuxd] usbmuxd: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
Bug 764692 cloned as bug 765010
> reassign 764692 libc0.1-dev
Bug #764692 [src:usbmuxd] usbmuxd: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
Bug reassigned from package 'src:usbmuxd' to 'libc0.1-dev'.
clone 764692 -1
reassign 764692 libc0.1-dev
found 764692 glibc/2.19-11
retitle 764692 glibc: removed __FAVOR_BSD from features.h
thanks
Hi,
On 12/10/14 16:45, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> glibc-provided features.h no longer defines a __FAVOR_BSD macro, so the
> BSD version of struct tcphdr in neti
4 matches
Mail list logo