On 28.09.2014 03:42, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 08:20:32PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>>
>> I'm going to combine our two branches and prepare the new upload.
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> I'm having an issue with this mojarra 2.2.8+dfsg-1 upload.
>
> The svn repo from where you dow
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 06:44:47PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>
> Yep, I need help with this because I have not much free time in the
> last weeks and freeze deadline is approaching.
>
Looking more closely at this I noticed the only package in Debian
depending on mojarra packages is libspring
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:37:35AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> Could you push your changes to Git please?
I pushed a branch named 2.2.8 to the git repo.
This branch is nowhere near to be uploaded.
To build it, you will need to add javaee-api-7.0.jar to the classpath.
However, this is FTBFS
On 17.09.2014 04:15, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> I keep working on this.
Hello and welcome back.
> So far, I was able to build 2.2.8 in Debian and this should fix all
> the serious bugs with this packages. I did this simplifying the build
> and replacing ant with javahelper. Another option is to ke
I keep working on this.
So far, I was able to build 2.2.8 in Debian and this should fix all
the serious bugs with this packages. I did this simplifying the build
and replacing ant with javahelper. Another option is to keep using
ant since Markus did some work in a branch.
However, as I said previ
Hi Markus,
I can take a look at your changes but not right now since I'm in
vacation right now.
I'll check this during the next week since I know this is a very
pressing issue and the clock is ticking for the next release.
Thanks for taking a look at this.
Cheers,
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium
On 25.08.2014 18:06, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
[...]
>> I'm now going to rebase your "debian-build" patch. Perhaps some of those
>> dependencies can be avoided.
>
> I'll take care of the missing B-D on JavaEE 6.0/7.0 API.
I have pushed a new branch, experimental, and the upstream sources a few
minut
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:41:15PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> I see that we are now working with three people on this issue. :) I've
> pushed some small changes. Please let me know if you agree with the
> updated get-orig-source target and if we should use upstream's SVN
> repository from no
Hi,
On 24.08.2014 18:55, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 07:22:37PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
>> I will investigate whether an update to 2.2.8 can resolve the issues
>> with mojarra. I'll report back as soon as it's done.
>
> I'm pretty sure 2.2.8 would resolve almost all
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 07:22:37PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> I will investigate whether an update to 2.2.8 can resolve the issues
> with mojarra. I'll report back as soon as it's done.
I'm pretty sure 2.2.8 would resolve almost all the outstaing issues.
However, after inspecting 2.2.8 I
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 07:22:37PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Hi,
>
> I will investigate whether an update to 2.2.8 can resolve the issues
> with mojarra. I'll report back as soon as it's done.
>
> Markus
>
Hi Markus,
I just had a very quick chat with Tony today (
Control: owner -1 !
Hi,
I will investigate whether an update to 2.2.8 can resolve the issues
with mojarra. I'll report back as soon as it's done.
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
