Hi Bálint,
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:27:27PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2014-08-02 18:43 GMT+02:00 Eloy Paris :
>
> > It looks like I have some issues, though, because the autobuilders
> > are having problems building netexpect 0.22-1 against the new
> > Wireshark 1.12 packages. It's strange
Hi Eloy,
2014-08-02 18:43 GMT+02:00 Eloy Paris :
> On 08/01/2014 05:24 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>
>> 2014-08-01 8:34 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey :
>>>
>>> 2014-08-01 4:07 GMT+02:00 Eloy Paris :
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 07:21:18PM -0400, Eloy Paris wrote:
[...]
> So 1.12.0 i
On 08/01/2014 05:24 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2014-08-01 8:34 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey :
2014-08-01 4:07 GMT+02:00 Eloy Paris :
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 07:21:18PM -0400, Eloy Paris wrote:
[...]
So 1.12.0 is now out. It's a bit late but I just uploaded to
experimental a new version of netexpec
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #751448 [netexpect] netexpect: FTBFS with wireshark 1.12.0~rc1-2 from
experimental
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
751448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
4 matches
Mail list logo