On 03/21/2014 04:10 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The security status of libv8 is also a bit worrisome, and another reason
> to drop the build dependency. We just need to deal with a number of
> FTBFSes for osgEarth and QGIS then.
This was enough for me to justify dropping the libv8-dev build
On 03/21/2014 03:43 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> The point is: is it possible to build without libv8-dev on those
> archs and still having a working product? In that case we could
> change the b-d chain appropriately.
Yes, we drop or loosen the b-d on libv8-dev and still have a useable
pac
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 03:26:04PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 03/21/2014 02:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > osgearth added an unconditional build-dep on libv8-dev, however
> > that package is only built on little endian archs by
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 15:26:04 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 02:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > osgearth added an unconditional build-dep on libv8-dev, however
> > that package is only built on little endian archs by the looks of
> > it (it's missing on mips, powerpc, s390
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/21/2014 02:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> osgearth added an unconditional build-dep on libv8-dev, however
> that package is only built on little endian archs by the looks of
> it (it's missing on mips, powerpc, s390x and sparc).
Because libv8
Source: osgearth
Version: 2.5.0+dfsg-0~exp1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
osgearth added an unconditional build-dep on libv8-dev, however that
package is only built on little endian archs by the looks of it (it's
missing on mi
6 matches
Mail list logo
