Hello Andreas,
>
> Perhaps you could simply verify if there is even Ruby 2.0 support and
> we simply need to upgrade? Just make sure you will not waste your
> time on old code. Feel free to commit directly to Debian Med SVN
> (any DD can do so) if this seems to be more simple.
sorry for the la
Hi Jonas,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 06:00:23PM +0100, Jonas Genannt wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> > That's perfectly OK for me but this means removing *all* ruby binding.
> > You are talking above about two versions. Is there any evidence that
> > you could create a package with newer Ruby version?
Hello Andreas,
> That's perfectly OK for me but this means removing *all* ruby binding.
> You are talking above about two versions. Is there any evidence that
> you could create a package with newer Ruby version?
since we are releasing Jessie only with one Ruby Version, we build sbml against
th
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:26:24PM +0100, Jonas Genannt wrote:
> I have had a look at the build system, the library do not use the standard
> ruby extension
> "extconf.rb" build method. Building the sbml ruby binding for two ruby
> version seems to
> be very hard to do.
>
> Since ther
Hello Andreas,
sorry for being so late - we had a talked about the ruby binding of sbml on
Mini Debconf
in Paris in January.
I have had a look at the build system, the library do not use the standard ruby
extension
"extconf.rb" build method. Building the sbml ruby binding for two ruby version
5 matches
Mail list logo
