On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 07:41:27PM +0100, Simon Guinot wrote:
> I also found very fascinating how you consider that a package breakage
> due to a library upgrade is a "normal/not a bug" stuff, even for sid.
> It smells like quality work here.
*temporary* breakage until the stuff is rebuilt. If har
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 05:58:43PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 03:16:00PM +0100, Simon Guinot wrote:
> > Some libreoffice-* packages can't be installed due to a broken
> > dependency between packages libharfbuzz-icu0, libharfbuzz0a and
> > libharfbuzz0b.
> >
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 03:16:00PM +0100, Simon Guinot wrote:
> Some libreoffice-* packages can't be installed due to a broken
> dependency between packages libharfbuzz-icu0, libharfbuzz0a and
> libharfbuzz0b.
>
> Note that the gnome package, which needs libreoffice, can't be
> installed as w
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:4.1.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Some libreoffice-* packages can't be installed due to a broken
dependency between packages libharfbuzz-icu0, libharfbuzz0a and
libharfbuzz0b.
Note that the gnome package, which needs
4 matches
Mail list logo
