Bug#710321: task: didn't handle conffile rename correctly

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastien Badia
tag 710321 + pending thanks On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:06:16PM (+0100), Jakub Wilk wrote: I believe it's because the version passed to dpkg-maintscript-help is too low. Argh! Indeed… Quoting the manpage: “If the conffile has not been shipped for several versions, and you are now modifying th

Processed: Re: Bug#710321: task: didn't handle conffile rename correctly

2015-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 710321 + pending Bug #710321 [src:task] task: didn't handle conffile rename correctly Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 710321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Bug#710321: task: didn't handle conffile rename correctly

2015-03-12 Thread Jakub Wilk
Control: found -1 2.4.1+dfsg-3 I still see both conffiles on my disk: $ ls -l /etc/bash_completion.d/task* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6082 Mar 1 22:51 /etc/bash_completion.d/task -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6082 Mar 1 22:51 /etc/bash_completion.d/task.sh I believe it's because the version passed to dp

Processed: Re: Bug#710321: task: didn't handle conffile rename correctly

2015-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 2.4.1+dfsg-3 Bug #710321 {Done: Sebastien Badia } [src:task] task: didn't handle conffile rename correctly Marked as found in versions task/2.4.1+dfsg-3; no longer marked as fixed in versions task/2.4.1+dfsg-3 and reopened. -- 710321: http://bugs.debian.

Bug#710321: task: didn't handle conffile rename correctly

2013-05-29 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: task Version: 2.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 task_2.0.0-1 ships this conffile: /etc/bash_completion.d/task task_2.1.2-1 ships it as: /etc/bash_completion.d/task.sh Unfortunately, I forgot to add maintainer scripts to deal with this rename. As a consequence, user