Hi, I've uploaded an nmu adding proftpd-mod-vroot as a recommends to
delayed/2. I believe this fixes the bug while respecting the
maintainer's request. Please let me know if I should delay longer.
Patch attached.
Best wishes,
Mike
proftpd.patch
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Assuming this is what the submitter upgraded to:
> found 704484 1.3.4a-4
Bug #704484 [proftpd-dfsg] Upgrading from Squeeze to Wheezy breaks proftpd
There is no source info for the package 'proftpd-dfsg' at version '1.3.4a-4'
with architecture '
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 704484 - patch
Bug #704484 [proftpd-dfsg] Upgrading from Squeeze to Wheezy breaks proftpd
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
704484: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
> mod_vroot used to be in proftpd-basic in squeeze, it's moved to a
> separate package in wheezy.
>
and to be honest I would avoid to add proftpd-mod-vroot as a strict
dependency. It is an optional (and experimental) module and the problem
would be simply resolved by installing it by hand after a
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 15:47 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi, I propose the attached patch to fix this issue.
It won't.
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add breaks relationship with openssl to make sure it gets upgraded
+(closes: #704484).
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Hi, I propose the attached patch to fix this issue.
Best wishes,
Mike
proftpd.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I would like to confirm this bug. The problem is actually bug #654694
[1]. Proftpd is checking that it is linked against the exact openssl
version including minor versions. Debian ships Openssl version 1.0.1e,
but because proftpd was compiled against 1.0.1e it does not start. In
fact it b
7 matches
Mail list logo
