On 06.03.2013 13:09, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:07:46AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks for the quick turn-around. Unfortunately the "getent user"
call above doesn't appear to be fixed in -9.
Another proof that there's just not enough time to work on Debian
these
days
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:07:46AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 06.03.2013 09:13, Guido Günther wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:48:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 18:02 +, Guido Günther wrote:
> >>> libvirt (0.9.12-8) unstable; urgency=low
> >>> .
> >>>
On 06.03.2013 09:13, Guido Günther wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:48:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 18:02 +, Guido Günther wrote:
> libvirt (0.9.12-8) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* [181eab1] CVE-2013-1766: Use libvirt-qemu as group to run
qemu/kvm
> in
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:48:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 18:02 +, Guido Günther wrote:
> > libvirt (0.9.12-8) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* [181eab1] CVE-2013-1766: Use libvirt-qemu as group to run qemu/kvm
> > instances. This makes sure we don't c
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 18:02 +, Guido Günther wrote:
> libvirt (0.9.12-8) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* [181eab1] CVE-2013-1766: Use libvirt-qemu as group to run qemu/kvm
> instances. This makes sure we don't chown files to groups possibly used
> by other programs. (Closes: #7016
5 matches
Mail list logo