On 03/03/13 13:57, Vitaly Pashkov wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> popcon showed exactly _zero_ installations.
>
> Probably a popcon bug or something, which is a different question. We
> are using clvm in 2 clusters currently and all of the nodes in it have
> pop
Julien Cristau writes:
> Somebody would have to properly maintain its dependencies in debian
> (redhat-cluster, and by extension gfs2-utils, corosync, ...). They're
> the reason the clvm package had to go.
Hi Julien,
We're running clvm over Corosync in wheezy (were using redhat-cluster
earlier
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The maintainer may not use clvm but many of us who have built large
scale production clusters do.
>
> popcon showed exactly _zero_ installations.
Probably a popcon bug or something, which is a different question. We
are using clvm in 2 c
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 15:57:52 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I am interested in continuing maintaining clvm in Ubuntu. I'm not sure
> about Debian.
>
> Is help required testing/maintaining the clvm portion of the package?
>
Somebody would have to properly maintain its dependencies in debian
4 matches
Mail list logo
