severity 696320 important
severity 696854 important
thanks
downgrading severity since there are workarounds (using LD_LIBRARY_PATH)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/debug/libstdc++.so.6 instead of
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 sounds wrong to me.
> Also, if it's indeed wrong then other versions of libstdc++ are affected
> too.
I am not clear wh
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/debug/libstdc++.so.6 instead of
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 sounds wrong to me.
Also, if it's indeed wrong then other versions of libstdc++ are affected
too.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Forgot the file.
bla.cxx
Description: Binary data
Package: libstdc++6-4.4-dbg
Version: 4.4.5-8
Severity: grave
Dear packager,
I believe the current -dbg package is not working as it should. Here is what I
did:
$ g++ -o bla -g bla.cxx
$ gdb bla
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3-debian
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL ve
5 matches
Mail list logo