On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 17:05:26 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 15:17:11 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >>> But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the is
On 12/05/2012 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 15:17:11 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>>> But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
>>> for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be disturbed by it durin
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 15:17:11 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
> > for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be disturbed by it during bug
> > squashing.
>
> So please consider sbu
On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
> for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be disturbed by it during bug
> squashing.
So please consider sbuild 0.63.2-1.1 for wheezy (freeze exemption).
(Maybe Roger will override t
On 12/05/2012 02:57 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:40:20PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> On 12/05/2012 01:57 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> what about NMUing the package right now once you have found a proper
>>> patch? If there are any reasons that might prevent you from uploa
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:40:20PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 12/05/2012 01:57 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > what about NMUing the package right now once you have found a proper
> > patch? If there are any reasons that might prevent you from uploading
> > just ping me about t
6 matches
Mail list logo
