On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Can't answer without a diff.
>
> Mediawiki maintainers, what's the status?
Oh, sorry. Other stuff made me forget this for too long.
The diff between the two tarballs is over 10
On 13/09/12 18:01, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:37:25 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>
>>> The Release Notes say that 1.19.2 is a security-fix release,
>>> and does not list any unrelated changes. Question
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:37:25 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> > The Release Notes say that 1.19.2 is a security-fix release,
> > and does not list any unrelated changes. Question is, (to the
> > more seasoned MW packagers) can
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:37:25 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> The Release Notes say that 1.19.2 is a security-fix release,
> and does not list any unrelated changes. Question is, (to the
> more seasoned MW packagers) can we trust that, and (to the
> Release Team) would it be acceptable to bump
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Please see here for more info:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/mediawiki/295767
Thanks.
The Release Notes say that 1.19.2 is a security-fix release,
and does not list any unrelated changes. Question is, (to the
more seasoned MW packag
Package: mediawiki
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see here for more info:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/mediawiki/295767
No CVE IDs available yet.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
6 matches
Mail list logo
