Hi paul,
paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au writes:
> I wonder if I am qualified to provide patches. What has me stumped
> is that I do not seem to be able to build sendmail-bin. Trying:
>
> tar zxf sendmail.8.14.4.tar.gz
> gzcat sendmail_8.14.4-2.1.diff.gz | patch -p0
> cd sendmail-8.14.4
> dpkg-bu
Dear Michael,
I guess that lockmbox() should not be called on entry to deliver(),
but that block moved to after the first flock().
I wonder about the close(mbfd) in line 1370: should unlockmbox() be
called just after, and lockmbox() called again after the re-open and
subsequent flock()?
---
I w
Hi Paul,
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:34:57 +1000
Paul Szabo wrote:
> ... fcntl() locking must be combined with dot locking.
> To avoid deadlocks, a program should use fcntl() first
> and dot locking after this, or alternatively implement
> the two locking methods in a non blocking way[100]. Us
Package: liblockfile1
Version: 1.09-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 11.6
Debian policy
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-customized-programs.html#s-mail-transport-agents
says:
... fcntl() locking must be combined with dot locking.
To avoid deadlocks, a program should use fcn
4 matches
Mail list logo
