Bug#683312: Please consider including this patch before wheezy

2013-01-14 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:25:50 +, Alex Owen wrote: > > What I did was switching the (-)-$args and $nots with perl, and > > comparing the result with your patch there's one difference: > > > > #v+ > > -+ push (@source, "$not -s $1 -m mac --mac-source $not > > $2"); > > ++

Bug#683312: Please consider including this patch before wheezy

2013-01-14 Thread Alex Owen
On 14 January 2013 19:04, gregor herrmann wrote: > I think I found another one ... > > What I did was switching the (-)-$args and $nots with perl, and > comparing the result with your patch there's one difference: > > #v+ > -+ push (@source, "$not -s $1 -m mac --mac-source $not $2

Bug#683312: Please consider including this patch before wheezy

2013-01-14 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:36:05 +, Alex Owen wrote: > >> I have regenerated the patch against uif- 1.0.6 to make it simple to > >> review and apply to the package currently in Wheezy. > > Seems you didn't attach this new patch? > Oops! Sorry! No problem :) > > BTW: After looking at your origina

Bug#683312: Please consider including this patch before wheezy

2013-01-14 Thread Alex Owen
On 14 January 2013 17:54, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:10:00 +, Alex Owen wrote: > >> I have regenerated the patch against uif- 1.0.6 to make it simple to >> review and apply to the package currently in Wheezy. > > Seems you didn't attach this new patch? Oops! Sorry! > > BTW

Bug#683312: Please consider including this patch before wheezy

2013-01-14 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:10:00 +, Alex Owen wrote: > I have regenerated the patch against uif- 1.0.6 to make it simple to > review and apply to the package currently in Wheezy. Seems you didn't attach this new patch? BTW: After looking at your original patch, I have the impression that you mi