Processed: Re: Bug#679964: snappy vs. snappy-player and BTS

2012-07-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 679964 src:snappy Bug #679964 {Done: se...@debian.org (Steinar H. Gunderson)} [snappy] snappy: FTBFS on armel due missing check for __ARM_ARCH_4T__ Bug reassigned from package 'snappy' to 'src:snappy'. No longer marked as found in versio

Bug#679964: snappy vs. snappy-player and BTS

2012-07-02 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
reassign 679964 src:snappy found 679964 1.0.5-1 close 679964 1.0.5-2 thanks On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 01:12:53AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > While this bug (#679964) is reported against binary package snappy > BTS shows this wrong? information: > > Package: snappy; Maintainer for snappy is Steina

Bug#679964: snappy vs. snappy-player and BTS

2012-07-02 Thread Touko Korpela
Looks like this bug belongs to sourcepackage snappy, not binary snappy (src:snappy-player). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679964: snappy vs. snappy-player and BTS

2012-07-02 Thread Touko Korpela
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:47:39AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > Looks like this bug belongs to sourcepackage snappy, not binary snappy > (src:snappy-player). While this bug (#679964) is reported against binary package snappy BTS shows this wrong? information: Package: snappy; Maintainer for snap