2012/6/28 Michael Gilbert :
> Try typing "wine".
> We could probably be better at being informative with a NEWS entry,
> but its not really at the top of my list of things to do. I would
> certainly be willing to apply an appropriate patch for that.
>
> Best wishes,
> Mike
Well, the only patch I
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Jakub Moc rote:
> Dear maintainer, is this some sort of poor joke, or what is going on
> here?
No.
> After the latest update to 1.5.6-1, installing wine-unstable
> results in installing two dummy, empty and absolutely useless packages
> on amd64.
>
>
> $ dpkg -L w
Dear maintainer, is this some sort of poor joke, or what is going on
here? After the latest update to 1.5.6-1, installing wine-unstable
results in installing two dummy, empty and absolutely useless packages
on amd64.
$ dpkg -L wine{,64-bin}-unstable
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/do
> That's because it's i386-only and wine-unstable:amd64 should install
> wine-bin-unstable:i386 (well, when i386 arch is enabled manually). Feel
> free to open a bug asking to document all of that because it's confusing
> indeed.
I am sorry, this is not confusing, this is simply mispackaged. The
p
Package: wine-unstable
Version: 1.1.36-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The original upload of wine-unstable for amd64 seems to be missing all packages.
The original acceptance mail [1] does not list them neither in the list of build
packages nor in the accepted packages.
5 matches
Mail list logo
