On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 04:08:04PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Indeed, and by that stage it's too late to do anything about it anyway
> - apt-get/aptitude will always have trouble dealing with the upgrade,
Right, so that's indeed not a viable option.
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:43:11PM -0400, Mi
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:52:43AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 03:37:10AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> > > I don't see amd64 packages in pool. The latest package version I see in
>> > > pool
>> > > i
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:52:43AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 03:37:10AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > I don't see amd64 packages in pool. The latest package version I see in
> > > pool
> > > is wine-bin_1.4-0.3_amd64.deb. The same with other wine package
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 03:37:10AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I don't see amd64 packages in pool. The latest package version I see in pool
> > is wine-bin_1.4-0.3_amd64.deb. The same with other wine packages for
> > amd64 arch.
>
> That is because the package has been "multiarched." In oth
4 matches
Mail list logo