Bug#676078: It seems certainly an improvement

2012-07-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
The proposed change effectively puts things back like they were before the default ruby version was changed, so it should work. In any case it does get the package building again, so I'll upload this as an NMU. Given it's an over a month old bug with no maintainer response, I'm uploading the a

Bug#676078: NMU diff

2012-07-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
It turns out not to be very hard to coerce it back to a buildable state with ruby1.8. NMU diff attached. Uploading since it's an RC bug over a month old with no maintainer response. Scott Kdiff -u merb-1.0.12+dfsg/debian/changelog merb-1.0.12+dfsg/debian/changelog --- merb-1.0.12+dfsg/debian/c

Bug#676078: Worse than that

2012-07-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
This bug is just the tip of the iceberg. The packaging needs to be almost totally reworked to build in the current Debian Ruby environment. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#676078:

2012-07-03 Thread shawn
switching the relevent line from rm foo to rm -f foo should do the trick was this file removed upstream? -- -Shawn Landden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#676078: merb: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `/«BUILDDIR»/merb-1.0.12+dfsg/debian/libmerb-slices-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/generators/templates/common/LICENSE': No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: merb Version: 1.0.12+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default19 Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to bui