Hi Daniel.
A bit late maybe, but...
> At its core, there's a concern here that asking a server to bind to a
> name might actually bind it to multiple addresses (since a name can have
> multiple addresses). I'm not convinced that Net::Server can be properly
> made to bind to multiple addresses wi
gregor herrmann wrote (06 Apr 2012 20:03:29 GMT) :
> Could any of our more IPv6-savvy members (dkg? intrigeri?) take
> a look at this patch?
For the record, I doubt very much I'm more IPv6-savvy than anyone
else here.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intri
On 04/06/2012 04:03 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:02:41 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately libnet-server-perl currently only binds an IPv6 socket
>> when asked for 'localhost' if localhost is both 127.0.0.1 and ::1 in
>> /etc/hosts. I think this is a bug. Consider a
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:02:41 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Unfortunately libnet-server-perl currently only binds an IPv6 socket
> when asked for 'localhost' if localhost is both 127.0.0.1 and ::1 in
> /etc/hosts. I think this is a bug. Consider a server:
>
> # perl -MNet::Server -e 'package S; use
4 matches
Mail list logo
