On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:43:17AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> * these fonts have unclear license status. It is not clear whether
> taking the various glyphs from various sides and adding some things
> and sticking it together is fine.
Technical issues aside, I'd like to ask everybody
FWIW, I agree with Norbert's analysis regarding cyrfonts and have
nothing to add ...
k
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear all,
Dear Karl,
@all: I include Karl Berry, maintainer of the fontname standard, head
of the TeX Live team, etc etc etc
@Karl: I think you remebered that I contacted you some time ago about
the problem with scalable-cyrfonts shipping fpl fonts conflicting
with fonts in TeX Live.
Here are my
[added debian-tex-maint@ldo to Cc]
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 14:54 +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> When the maintainter created this package many years ago (that was me)
> there was no such conflict and the font names of the package were
> compliant with the font name guidelines used by the TeX commu
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:16:32AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Both of the current RC bugs against scalable-cyrfonts seem to be
> > related to the
> > -tex binary package. If the binary package isn't needed any more (as
> > the above
> > suggests), maybe it should just be dropped?
> Mayb
5 matches
Mail list logo
