Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-06-01 Thread Frank S. Thomas
On Friday 01 June 2012 15:23:27 gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:19:42 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > >> If you have the time to create a debdiff, great. > > >> Otherwise I can also do it myself. > > > > > > Here it is. LDFLAGS is exported now as well. Otherwise the maintainer

Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-06-01 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:19:42 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >> If you have the time to create a debdiff, great. > >> Otherwise I can also do it myself. > > Here it is. LDFLAGS is exported now as well. Otherwise the maintainer's > > change > > from 1.61.0-5 is reverted, i.e the unneeded depend

Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-06-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 01/06/12 14:17, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 01/06/12 01:03, gregor herrmann wrote: >> If you have the time to create a debdiff, great. >> Otherwise I can also do it myself. > > Here it is. LDFLAGS is exported now as well. Otherwise the maintainer's change > from 1.61.0-5 is reverted, i.e the

Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-06-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 01/06/12 01:03, gregor herrmann wrote: > If you have the time to create a debdiff, great. > Otherwise I can also do it myself. Here it is. LDFLAGS is exported now as well. Otherwise the maintainer's change from 1.61.0-5 is reverted, i.e the unneeded dependencies are back. Cheers -- Sebastian

Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-05-31 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 31 May 2012 19:40:43 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Here's a different approach to this issue that looks more > > debhelper-ish to me. > Yes, definitely. :) > > But lintian -F (ftp-amster autoreject reasosns) reports a problem: > > E: euler: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath usr/bin/e

Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-05-31 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 31/05/12 19:18, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 12 May 2012 23:29:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >> On 30/03/12 11:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>> Relevant part: gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-1) configure:2329: $? = 0 configure:2331: gcc -V &5 gcc: error: unrecogniz

Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-05-31 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 12 May 2012 23:29:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 30/03/12 11:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Relevant part: > >> gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-1) > >> configure:2329: $? = 0 > >> configure:2331: gcc -V &5 > >> gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V' > >> gcc: fatal error: no input

Processed: Re: Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 666337 + patch Bug #666337 [src:euler] euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V' Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 666337: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-05-12 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
tags 666337 + patch thanks On 30/03/12 11:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Relevant part: >> gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-1) >> configure:2329: $? = 0 >> configure:2331: gcc -V &5 >> gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V' >> gcc: fatal error: no input files >> compilation terminated. Please find att

Bug#666337: euler: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'

2012-03-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: euler Version: 1.61.0-8 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This rebuild was done by b