Bug#665068: Bug#637562: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665068: Bug#637562: [octave-sp] missing dependency on octave-control

2012-04-10 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:08:57 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > >> the run_cmd.m script is packaged in octave-control package. So > >> ocatave-sp should depend on that. > > Not any more, according to #665068 and dpkg -L octave-control ... > Thanks for taking care. I was just looking through RC bu

Bug#665068: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665068: Bug#637562: [octave-sp] missing dependency on octave-control

2012-04-10 Thread Sébastien Villemot
tags 665068 + wontfix tags 637562 + wontfix thanks gregor herrmann writes: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:51:23 +0100, Wouter M. Koolen wrote: > >> the run_cmd.m script is packaged in octave-control package. So >> ocatave-sp should depend on that. > > Not any more, according to #665068 and dpkg -L oct

Processed: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665068: Bug#637562: [octave-sp] missing dependency on octave-control

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 665068 + wontfix Bug #665068 [src:semidef-oct] semidef-oct: FTBFS: error: No such file or directory Added tag(s) wontfix. > tags 637562 + wontfix Bug #637562 [octave-sp] [octave-sp] missing dependency on octave-control Added tag(s) wontfix.

Bug#665068: Bug#637562: [octave-sp] missing dependency on octave-control

2012-04-10 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:51:23 +0100, Wouter M. Koolen wrote: > the run_cmd.m script is packaged in octave-control package. So > ocatave-sp should depend on that. Not any more, according to #665068 and dpkg -L octave-control ... Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Op