Bug#664872: broken cvs in squeeze-security

2012-04-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:43 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Bernhard R. Link dixit: > >The following patch moves he deletion behind dh_compress, > >thus actually matching something. > > OK. Thanks! fwiw, I assume s/\.gz//g on the affected lines would also have worked. > Should I upload this, or

Bug#664872: broken cvs in squeeze-security

2012-04-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Bernhard R. Link dixit: >The effect you see is usually not from a unclean chroot, but from a >non-minimal chroot. Non-minimal is unclean. >It essentially means that the cvs package misses >either code to mitigate this or misses a Build-Conflicts. Possibly… the package from squeeze and older is

Bug#664872: broken cvs in squeeze-security

2012-04-06 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Thorsten Glaser [120321 18:40]: > In fact, neither do the auto-built packages on e.g. armel which > I can download to verify that. > > So I highly suspect someone entrusted with debian-security not only > uploads packages against maintainers wishes with broken version numbers > but also does not

Bug#659861: Bug#664872: broken cvs in squeeze-security

2012-03-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >For the record, the package I would have uploaded to fix the security >issue, with a non-bogus version number, did not have this issue: In fact, neither do the auto-built packages on e.g. armel which I can download to verify that. So I highly suspect someone entrusted with debian-sec