Robert Millan (03/03/2012):
> AFAICS the only remaining issues are:
>
> freebsd-buildutils is only 8 days old. It must be 10 days old to go in.
> kfreebsd-kernel-headers is only 4 days old. It must be 10 days old
> to go in.
>
> Instead of waiting one more week, perhaps it'd make sense t
On 03.03.2012 16:07, Robert Millan wrote:
AFAICS the only remaining issues are:
freebsd-buildutils is only 8 days old. It must be 10 days old to
go in.
kfreebsd-kernel-headers is only 4 days old. It must be 10 days
old
to go in.
Well, there's also freebsd-utils (5/10 days) and:
El 28 de febrer de 2012 22:07, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> The packages which have not been successfully rebuilt thus far are:
>
> - cdparanoia - maintainers, are there plans for an upload to resolve
> #660403? If not, would you be averse to an NMU purely containing the
> updated kBSD patch?
>
>
El 28 de febrer de 2012 22:07, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:08 +, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
>> #661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
>
> That rather depends on [...]
No worr
tag 660403 + pending
thanks
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 23:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 18:59 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 18:07, Adam D. Barratt
> > wrote:
> > > The packages which have not been successfully rebuilt thus far are:
> > >
> > > - cd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 660403 + pending
Bug #660403 [src:cdparanoia] cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
660403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6604
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 18:59 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 18:07, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
> > The packages which have not been successfully rebuilt thus far are:
> >
> > - cdparanoia - maintainers, are there plans for an upload to resolve
> > #660403? If not, would you be
Hi, Adam.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 18:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The packages which have not been successfully rebuilt thus far are:
>
> - cdparanoia - maintainers, are there plans for an upload to resolve
> #660403? If not, would you be averse to an NMU purely containing the
> updated kBSD pat
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:08 +, Robert Millan wrote:
> Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
> #661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
That rather depends on how long we think it's likely to take to get the
rest of the transition done, an
9 matches
Mail list logo
