Coin,
I had to remove jadetex to continue upgrading my machine, and it was
in fact purged. After reinstalling the problem still arise.
On another machine having texlive-full and jadetex too i could not
reproduce. I'm still trying to find a real different besides the
architecture (i386 in
On 20.02.12 Rogério Brito (rbr...@ime.usp.br) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: texlive-binaries
> Followup-For: Bug #659907
>
> Hi there.
>
> I'm also seeing something which looks like this bug, but I am not sure if
> the symptoms are just the same, with a different cause.
>
This is probably #612924. For
Package: texlive-binaries
Followup-For: Bug #659907
Hi there.
I'm also seeing something which looks like this bug, but I am not sure if
the symptoms are just the same, with a different cause.
I don't have jadetex installed.
For some reason, reverting back to stable's version of texlive-base (*n
On 15.02.12 Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.net) wrote:
> retitle 659907 texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex installed
> thanks
>
> On 2012-02-14 19:47:16 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
Hi Marc,
> > The log is attached. Maybe this is a bug in jadetex, but as it worked
> > before,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 659907 texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex installed
Bug #659907 [texlive-binaries] texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade
Changed Bug title to 'texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex
installed' from 'texlive-binaries: fa
retitle 659907 texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex installed
thanks
On 2012-02-14 19:47:16 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> The log is attached. Maybe this is a bug in jadetex, but as it worked
> before, it may as well be a regression in your latest upload, so i'm
> reporting to th
6 matches
Mail list logo
