On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:32:07PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> Do you recommend that we build the next NetCDF from 4.1.1 or should we
> use the 4.1.3 from experimental as the base?
>
> Regards
> Alastair
>
AFAIK Sylvestre is going to reset the dependencies chain in hdf5
Hi Francesco,
Do you recommend that we build the next NetCDF from 4.1.1 or should we
use the 4.1.3 from experimental as the base?
Regards
Alastair
On 2012-02-07 13:17, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:28:00AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> On 2012-02-02 01:43, Ste
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:28:00AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> On 2012-02-02 01:43, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to contribute towards a solution for this. I'm forwarding to
> > debian-devel to get some others' ideas.
> > Naively, I don't understand why netcdf can't offe
On 2012-02-02 01:43, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to contribute towards a solution for this. I'm forwarding to
> debian-devel to get some others' ideas.
> Naively, I don't understand why netcdf can't offer multiple variants,
> just as hdf5 does. Or, at least, one package libnetcdf-m
4 matches
Mail list logo
