Bug#654839: Reducing the severity

2012-02-03 Thread Anton Gladky
severity 654839 wishlist thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#654839: Reducing the severity

2012-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 654839 wishlist Bug #654839 [paraview] paraview should depend on libvtk5-dev Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654839:

Bug#654839: Reducing the severity

2012-01-28 Thread Anton Gladky
I have fixed paraview-python and python-vtk conflict in paraview_3.12.0-3. If there are no other comments related to the topic of the bug, I am going to reduce the severity. Thank you. Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#654839: Reducing the severity

2012-01-27 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
t; I do not see any reasons to keep the bug as "Serious", > Comments are welcome. Please leave this bug as serious. You did not address my concern from: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654839#50 This package as-is should not go to wheezy. Thanks, -- Mathieu -- T

Bug#654839: Reducing the severity

2012-01-26 Thread Anton Gladky
I'm going to reduce the severity of the bug to the "Wishlist". When (if?) upstream will provide USE_SYSTEM_VTK option, then we will definitely switch the paraview to the packaged version of VTK. I do not see any reasons to keep the bug as "Serious", Comments are welcome. Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#654839: Fwd: [Paraview] Convenient copy of VTK within ParaView

2012-01-16 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> Forwarding upstream comments. >> I think now we have two options: >> >> - Start working on PV 3.12 and getting rid of convenient copy of VTK. >> I do not think it will b

Bug#654839: Fwd: [Paraview] Convenient copy of VTK within ParaView

2012-01-15 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Forwarding upstream comments. > I think now we have two options: > > - Start working on PV 3.12 and getting rid of convenient copy of VTK. > I do not think it will be too difficult since VTK 5.8.0 was released > not too long ago

Bug#654839: Fwd: [Paraview] Convenient copy of VTK within ParaView

2012-01-15 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Forwarding upstream comments. I think now we have two options: - Start working on PV 3.12 and getting rid of convenient copy of VTK. I do not think it will be too difficult since VTK 5.8.0 was released not too long ago - Mark that PV 3.12 is shipped with convenient copy of VTK, and only upload wit

Bug#654839:

2012-01-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Forwared upstream: http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/2012-January/023675.html -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#654839: paraview should depend on libvtk5-dev

2012-01-09 Thread Anton Gladky
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:> ... > This was my point when I requested to move VTK to deb-sci umbrella, I> > believe those two packages needs the same team of maintainer, and a> very > close communication.>... I think it is a good idea to maintain VTK and Paraview u

Bug#654839: paraview should depend on libvtk5-dev

2012-01-07 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> Really it boils down to two things: >> - What is upstream position on this ? If upstream really do want to >> release  paraview on fixed schedule, with backward compati

Bug#654839: paraview should depend on libvtk5-dev

2012-01-07 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Really it boils down to two things: > - What is upstream position on this ? If upstream really do want to > release paraview on fixed schedule, with backward compatible code so > that people can build paraview with the latest st

Bug#654839: paraview should depend on libvtk5-dev

2012-01-07 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi, On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > We already discussed it some months ago. From my point of view, it is > not so simple... Agreed > At least the list of compiled vtk-libraries in vtk and paraview > packages is not the same [1] and [2]. That's a totally different point.

Bug#654839: paraview should depend on libvtk5-dev

2012-01-06 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Dominique, We already discussed it some months ago. From my point of view, it is not so simple... At least the list of compiled vtk-libraries in vtk and paraview packages is not the same [1] and [2]. Also VTK and Paraview are not usually releasing at the same time (I think, Mathieu noticed it

Bug#654839: paraview should depend on libvtk5-dev

2012-01-05 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Package: paraview Severity: serious Please remove Paraview's VTK directory and link instead against Debian's vtk libraries. Thanks -Dominique