Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-08-01 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:57:21PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mo, 01 Aug 2011, Frank Küster wrote: >> Please don't overreact. Upstream has a fine mechanism to record >> licenses of packages and even individual files, and all we need to do is > Individual packages, yes, individual files,

Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-08-01 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mo, 01 Aug 2011, Frank Küster wrote: > Please don't overreact. Upstream has a fine mechanism to record > licenses of packages and even individual files, and all we need to do is Individual packages, yes, individual files, no. > to find someone with write access to The Catalogue (like you or m

Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-08-01 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi everyone, > >> 1) Include that license in debian/copyright, document which part it >> applies to. > > Just to make one thing clear. *I* will not go down this road. I will > *never* collect the license statements 15000+ files. [...] > I take the license statement o

Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-07-28 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi everyone, > 1) Include that license in debian/copyright, document which part it > applies to. Just to make one thing clear. *I* will not go down this road. I will *never* collect the license statements 15000+ files. If you want this, please remove TeX from Debian and all will be happy. I

Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-07-28 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:21:39PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Am 26.07.2011 12:27, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: >> Given that the true sources seem to have disappeared, I suppose we >> could consider the .sty file to be its own source; it is a stretch, >> but removing unicode suppor

Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-07-28 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 26.07.2011 12:27, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: [..] > Given that the true sources seem to have disappeared, I suppose we > could consider the .sty file to be its own source; it is a stretch, > but removing unicode support for (La)TeX would be rather > ... damaging. I really, really vote fo

Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-07-28 Thread Norbert Preining
On Do, 28 Jul 2011, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Now, with what Norbert said (will not bother about fixing a single > LaTeX package) if we get Wolfgang Jeltsch to upload to CTAN *now*, > then it will be in TeXlive 2012, so in.. wheezy+1, because wheezy will And it will end up also in the TL2011 pac

Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-07-28 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:02:39PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >>> So I'm out of ideas how to find the "real" sources. >> Given that the true sources seem to have disappeared, > Hm, just googling for ucs.dtx (...) Now, why didn't that cross my mind is a fair questio

Bug#635382: latex-unicode sources and licensing

2011-07-27 Thread Frank Küster
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > clone 635382 -1 > retitle 635382 latex-unicode sources and licensing > severity 635382 serious > thanks Thank you for your work. >> So I'm out of ideas how to find the "real" sources. > > Given that the true sources seem to have disappeared, Hm, just googling for u