On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:05:35PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:04:39PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:56:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:04:39PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:56:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the output to determine
> > > the problem without digging muc
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:56:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the output to determine
> > the problem without digging much further. Perhaps you have some ideas.
> >
> > The detailed output f
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the output to determine
> the problem without digging much further. Perhaps you have some ideas.
>
> The detailed output from sparc is below.
> I believe that the output is similar if not the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:22:52AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: openvswitch
> Version: 1.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> openvswitch FTBFS on big endian architectures (mips, powerpc, s390
> and sparc) due to a failure in the testsuite. Full build logs are
> available:
>
> https://buildd
Package: openvswitch
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
openvswitch FTBFS on big endian architectures (mips, powerpc, s390
and sparc) due to a failure in the testsuite. Full build logs are
available:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openvswitch&arch=mips&ver=1.1.0-1&stamp=130389932
6 matches
Mail list logo
